Monday, December 29, 2008
ATTENTION: OFODC QUARTERLY MEETING JAN.18,2009
Please RSVP to Sharon as soon as possible. Thank You.
More specific details to follow as we approach the meeting date.
Sharon Unrau
OFODC Recording Secretary
Thursday, December 18, 2008
UPDATE ON HB 446!!!!!!!!
At the eleventh hour, the National Rifle Association made calls and their presence known causing the senators on the committee to back away from support.
In all the opposition prevailed!
Bobbi Brady
Tuesday, December 16, 2008
Urgent Update From Bobbi Brady!!!
TESTIMONY REPRESENTING OFODC REGARDING BILL 446
From: Meredith Johnson-Snyder and Roberta Brady 12/16/08
The
Re: Bill 446
To: Committee Members
Dear Senators:
We appreciate several of the amendments introduced, but we still have a couple of concerns not addressed in the amendments to the bill which we hope will be considered.
First: Raising the kennel fee and the fee for individual dogs is rather double dipping. Please consider reducing the kennel licensing fee and requiring only nominal fee per individual dog than is called for in this bill. The media has claimed that
For breeders to pay for a higher priced dog kennel license and then pay the regular individual license fee is punitive to dog breeders. As the Ohio Revised Code reads now, the purchaser of a kennel license only has to pay one or two dollars for individual licenses over the five dogs the kennel license presently includes. Since show and hobby breeders often keep puppies past the three month licensing grace period, the higher individual licensing fees will be a real burden. Also, unlike the big volume substandard breeders, show and hobby breeders usually keep retired dogs until they die of old age adding to the numbers to be licensed with the higher individual fee schedule. Substandard kennels simply destroy dogs that are no longer useful, while we either find wonderful homes for them or keep them ourselves driving our numbers up. Should we be penalized with higher for caring for our elderly dogs instead of crassly destroying them when no longer useful?
With the present anti breeding atmosphere in this country created and pushed by PETA, HSUS, and other animal rights groups, reputable purebred dog breeders are finding that they are considered “bad guys” for breeding at all. With all the legislation being proposed, initiated or at least backed by animal rights groups in our country, the small show or hobby breeder does not have the resources or the organization to fight back. PETA’s bottom line is the elimination of animal ownership. The raising of kennel fees and individual licensing fees places an additional burden on breeders trying to breed fine representatives of their breeds. If show and hobby breeders give up, all that will be left are the substandard breeders who raise dogs only for a profit.
Second: Please create a sliding scale for fees for licensing for dogs owned by those on social security, disability, or welfare. Often those in poverty or borderline poverty, especially the elderly already make trade offs when deciding whether to spend their meager funds on heat, food, or medicine. Often a dog is the only companion and comfort for those in need, especially the elderly. For families with children who are barely making it in this economy, giving up the family dog/dogs because of higher licenses seems cruel. To ask those in financial distress to pay licenses that are more than they can afford for the one or two pets that give them comfort and companionship making a big difference in their lives, is creating a hardship. Please consider a sliding scale for licensing fees for those in financial need.
Sunday, December 14, 2008
TUESDAY!! Senate State and Local Government and Veterans' Affairs Committee notice 12/16/08
State and Local Government and Veterans Affairs Committee
Tuesday, December 16, 2008
10:00 a.m.
South Hearing Room
(Webster) Pro/Opp/IP Testimony
Possible Amendments
Possible Vote
**possible vote
***amendments or possible sub bill
Tuesday, December 9, 2008
TODAY'S SENATE HEARING!!!
We would like to urge everyone to write to their legislator to oppose the passage of this bill. It does not benefit the welfare of dogs.
Thanks
Bobbi
NOTICE OF MEETING_TUESDAY DEC 9,2008
State and Local Government and Veterans Affairs Committee
Notice of Meeting
Tuesday, December 9, 2008
2:30 p.m. or after Session
Senate Finance Hearing Room
AGENDA
S.B. 353**(***) Land reutilization corporations-create/abandoned 5th Hearing (if needed)
(Spada/Harris) land foreclosure-revise Pro/Opp/IP Testimony
Possible Amendments
Possible Vote
S.B. 387 Veterans relocating to
(Grendell) immediately eligible for Sponsor Testimony
S.C.R. 22
(Mason/Turner) Sponsor Testimony
S.B. 375**(***) Fraud reporting system-complaints of fraud & 3rd Hearing
(Wagoner) misuse of public funds by public offices Proponent/Opponent
Interested Party Testimony
PA/PV
H.B. 525**(***) Recordable documents-be in standard format 3rd Hearing
(Combs) Pro/Opp/IP Testimony
PA/PV
S.B. 362**(***) Witness mileage fees-court and state 3rd Hearing
(Cates) administrative adjudications-adjust Pro/Opp/IP Testimony
PA/PV
H.B. 446*** Animal control-revise statutes 5th Hearing
(Webster) Pro/Opp/IP Testimony
Possible Amendments
H.B. 327*** Boards of health-city and general health districts 4th Hearing
(J. McGregor) Pro/Opp/IP Testimony
Possible Amendments
*pending introduction and referral
**possible vote
***amendments or possible sub bill
Note: Written testimony (30 copies) for the committee members is requested. Please provide the chairman’s office with copies (30) of any amendments by Friday, December 4 at 2:00 p.m.
Thursday, December 4, 2008
Short Synopsis of the Hearing By Bobbi
Paula emphasized the financial hardship to owners and breeders by increases in licensing fees. It is not inconceivable that owners may turn their pets in to shelters for being too costly in these economic tough times. Paula also stated that breeders who have kennel licenses will suffer a higher cost plus the individual tags. Amongst other things, she suggested a graduated scale of fees. Also objected to was the administration of mandatory rabies vaccine by a licensed veterinarian or under their supervision. A costly endeavor.
Bobbi Brady
Wednesday, December 3, 2008
CHRISTMAS/HOLIDAY CARD CHALLENGE
DOBERMAN PINSCHER CLUB OF AMERICA
AMERICAN ROTTWEILER CLUB
CHRISTMAS/HOLIDAY CARD CHALLENGE
The point of this Challenge is personal contact between dog owners and legislators. Sure, they hear from us when we fax or email about a piece of legislation but we all know they rarely read those messages, they simply tally pros and cons. A card will be a personal, positive contact.
The aim here is to have each official receive a Christmas/Holiday/New Year's greeting from their dog (cat) owning constituents.
We ask that you send cards to your Governor, district officials as well as your city and county officials. At best this would only involve sending an extra dozen cards which will have you and your dog's (or cat's) photo and a comment such as those listed below. If these officials are people you voted for, state that you have supported them in the past and hope to continue your support.
If you did not vote for them let them know that depending on their position on dog related issues, you would certainly consider changing party affiliation to support the candidate most sensitive to the interests of their pet owning constituency. If you own Conformation dogs, include a win picture or photo of you, the dog and ribbons and trophies. Sign the card “Proud owner of an AKC Champion (breed)”.
If you own a dog with performance titles, include a photo of the dog out duck hunting, with the
sheep, whatever, and sign the card, “Proud working partner to a (title/event) dog. i.e. “Proud
working partner to a Field Trial Champion (breed)”.
If you own a dog with a CGC from AKC, include a photo of you, the dog, and the certificate. Sign
the card, “Proud owner of a Canine Good Citizen (breed)”.
If you own a Therapy Dog, include a photo with you, the dog, a Senior Citizen or hospitalized
child. Sign the card, “Active partners bringing joy to shut-ins, Mary and Fluffy”.
If you own a Tracking Dog, especially one certified for Search and Rescue, include a photo of
yourself and the dog - preferably working or “in uniform” and sign the card, “proudly serving the
community of (city/county) with Search and Rescue efforts, Mary and Sport”.
If you own a Service Dog, include a photo of the two of you, or of the dog and it's backpack or
performing a service like opening the door or retrieving something. Sign the card, “Blessed with
the service of “Fluffy” my service dog and constant companion, Mary Smith”.
If your dog assists with a reading program in the local school, include a picture of you, the dog
and some kids and sign the it, “Proudly helping children to read better, John and Rex”.
If you are a Judge, include a nice BIS win photo with everyone looking good, you, the handler, and the dog. Sign it, “Proud judge of AKC dog shows, Joe Judge, Lic. ####”.
If your dog does agility, include a really nice action shot of the dog and sign the card,
“Enthusiastic participants in the sport of Agility, Speedy and Mary Smith”.
For friends/family who own dogs obtained from a shelter or rescue, include a photo and sign the
card, “Proud Adopter of Charlie, rescue dog from (shelter/rescue group), The Jones Family”.
Puppy buyers should send cards stating “sharing our lives with a (breed) purchased from a
responsible hobby breeder, The Smith Family”.
Kennel & Training Clubs, vets, groomers and rescues should do the same with messages like:
· Successfully hosting all breed shows in (city/county) for XXX years.
· Successfully helping owners train their dogs to be good citizens in (city/county).
· Providing quality medical care to (city/county) pets.
· Keeping (city/county) canine residents well groomed for xxx years.
· Proudly re-homing “thrown away” dogs and cats in (city/county) to new forever homes.
ALWAYS use “owner”, “owners”, “owned by” - NEVER use the words “guardian”or “caretaker”.
We think you get the drift here what we are looking for - positive contact from constituents to
elected officials. If enough people do this, including friends and family with photos of them, the
kids, and the family pet(s) signed “Happily sharing family life with our (breed/mixed) dog(s)”,
legislators will realize just how many constituents are out there with pets. You could even neatly
write at the bottom of the card, “My Dog Votes”.
Naturally, you would be free to elaborate on your card, but keep it simple, not related to any
particular legislation.
The cost of a couple more Christmas/Holiday cards, stamps, and photos is negligible compared
to what you will suffer should anti-dog legislation be enacted in your community, county, or state.
In the case of state or federal officials, the cards should be sent to their home/district offices - not
their State Capital address.
Please crosspost this DPCA/ARC Challenge to appropriate lists and all kennel clubs, trainers,
judges, veterinarians, groomers, and pet owners. Together we can make a positive impression on
our officials - let them know we are out there; let them know we are voters; let them put faces to
their 2 and 4 footed constituents.
The American Rottweiler Club has partnered with the DPCA in issuing this Challenge. Will your
club or organization join us?
Thank you,
Dana M. Johnson Jan Cooper
DPCA Legislative Director ARC Legislative Chair
It is suggested that kennel clubs post this Challenge on their websites along with the
appropriated addresses for state and local officials – making it very easy for members and friends to participate in this effort.
Art Work by Deborah McClelland, Jarde English Cockers